|

|
This section you are
viewing includes these additional pages |

|


Disclaimer: Information contained in pages and
articles on this site provide general information and are not intended to
provide legal advice on any specific legal matter or factual situation.
This information is not intended to create or provide a lawyer-client
relationship. It is not legal advice. Readers should not act upon this
information without seeking professional counsel.
Read full Disclaimers and Legal
Notices.
| |
EXPERTS MUST VOICE THEIR OPINIONS AS INVOLVING FACTS, NOT LAW
Experts should phrase their opinions as being opinions about the facts of the
case, not as being opinions about the law of the case. If the opinion is
merely an opinion about what the law is, it runs the risk of not being admitted.
For example, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
held recently that the declarations of two nationally recognized legal ethics
experts voicing their opinions on whether a federal district judge must recuse
herself from securities fraud litigation in light of undisputed facts about her
stock holdings were inadmissible. Why? Because expert testimony cannot be
considered on issues of law. For more on the case, see Volume 17
Issue 25 December 5, 2001, ABA/BNA Lawyers' Manual on Professional Conduct at p
709.
|
|