Getting the Opinion in Under the Daubert-Joiner-Kumho Tests.

Summary of This Article.

In the federal courts and in those state courts that follow Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579 (1993) the admissibility of an experts= opinion testimony is dependent on meeting certain criteria. The web pages that make up this article are a practical and concise description of what is required in getting an expert's opinion admitted (or excluded) under the Daubert line of federal cases and the similar cases in the various states.

To make this a working document for busy lawyers and expert witnesses, I first state my conclusion in a form usable in the office and courtroom. I call it the "Eight Eligibility Elements". The conclusion is drawn from various cases and texts, some of which are discussed in this article.

After stating my shorthand version of a nearly universal "elements of admissibility,"  I proceed with a history and more extended description of the gatekeeper function and what is necessary to get an expert opinion in (or keep it out).

Finally, I include some observations about trial procedures and tactics. Additionally, appendixes are provided which contain an exhaustive admissibility/exclusion checklist, a list of principal cases for further reading, and a proposed pre-trial order regarding Daubert style challenges.

In recent years many lawyers have seen their case collapse because their expert’s opinion was excluded from evidence. You do not want to be one of those lawyers! (See "Expert Flunking the Gatekeeping Tests - the Consequences.)

Continue reading         © Copyright Leonard H. Bucklin 2000 to 08/28/2007 ©

Check material on Evidence Rule 702

 Or go back to our Daubert Article Table of Contents   

Here is the best one website for the law on Daubert- Daubert on the Web.  Bucklin does the reporting for a couple of the states's law summarized there.